This blog is an experiment in using blogs in higher education. Most of the experiments done here are the first of their kind at least in India. I wish this trend catches on....
The Blog is dedicated to Anup Dhar and Lawrence Liang whose work has influenced many like me . . . .
Monday, July 28, 2008
Claude Levi-Strauss on a structuralist approach to Oedipus the King
The Structural Study of Myth – Levis-strauss
Gives insight into Sophocles’ play
Interaction bw linguistics, anthropology, and literature
Basic problem of contradiction in myth
In a myth anything can happen
No logic no continuity
Any characteristic can be attributed to any subject
But there is similarity in the myths collected in different regions throughout the world
Ancient philosophers and language
Definite sounds related to definitemeaning
But differ across language
Saussure – relations among units of sounds and not units of sound produces meaning
Carl Jung’s attempt to find meaning in basic units of myth (archetypes) similar to ancient philosophers
Saussure - language
Unchanging elements - grammar
Changing elements – sequence of words
Synchronic and diachronic
Myth expresses meaning both
diachronically (
synchronically (part of larger myth)
Similar to a sentence
Jack hates Jill
Jill hates Jack
Levis-Strauss – basic elements of myth are not isolated relations but “bundles of such relations”
To read a myth properly need to pay attention to the story as it proceeds and to relations within, btwn, among stories
Need to see wh happens before and after the story
Cadmus – Europa –Zeus – Delphic oracle – city – Thebes – kills Ares the god of war – saws teeth – Spartois spring up – flings a stone – they kill each other – Son Polydorus fathers Oedipus
Oedipus’ sons - Etocles kills Polynieces – denied burial – sister Antigone give funeral – buried alive
All relations in one column exhibit a common feature
I column – overemphasized blood relations More intimate than they should be
II column – (inverted) Underrating blood relations
III Column – monsters being slain
IV Column – difficulties in walking straight and standing upright
Relations btwn and among columns
I& II logical contrast
III 0- killing monsters – dragons associated with the earth – a dragon must be slain before men can be born from earth – sphinx will not permit men to live
Livi- Strauss – Basic origin of human life addressed by many cultures
Vegetable springs from earth – decays and back into earth – human bodies
Judeo-Christian culture – man from clay
Today people are born from union of two
III- monsters are overcome by men – denial of the origin of humans from the earth
Myth therefore includes both aspect of human origin of life
Myths that show humans springing from earth all over the world also talk of initial difficulty of walking
IV column affirms individual origin in the earth
III denies it
Original problem – born from one or born from two?
Born from different or born from same
Earlier and later versions of myth
Both are not true – coz myth made of all its variants
Freud’s concept of “Oedipus Complex”- latest variation of the myth itself – child trying to overvalue one parent against the other – born of one or two
Levi-Struss shows issues around and in the play
Also shows myth as dramatic- both aspects of human expression are less concerned with delivering the message than dramatizing the intractable questions about the meaning of human life.
No comments:
Post a Comment