Now you can view this blog on your mobile phones! Give a try.

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Negotiation and the Female Self in Sarah Joseph's The Scooter (Jude Gerald Lopez: 1324106)


The target of feminism as a discourse can be said to be social structures that enforce a patriarchal mode of thinking which quite evidently dominates the social sphere and contributes to the subjugation of the female sex. Tejaswini Niranjana in her essay “Feminism and Culture Studies in Asia” sheds light on the problematized state of feminism in terms of its reception. She says:

A standard criticism of feminism across Asia derives from a charge that it is disconnected/alienated from ‘our culture’. This is a charge that is seldom made against any of our other political frameworks which are far from having a clearly identifiable ‘indigenous’ source. The implicit accusation seems to be that feminist demands are modern demands, and modernization means the erasure or giving up of Indian culture and the adaptation of western values and ways of life. (3)

It is in this space, where the objections are many, that the female self through representation should write its way into history and eliminate the haunting tag of ‘the other’ that has come to characterize it due to the dominance of what feminists call a male centered literature. Sarah Jospeh’s short story The Scooter translated by Gita Krishnakutty tries to portray the female self and its intricate idiosyncrasies which constantly negotiates with the roles assigned to it by society and with the whole process of reciprocity which is fundamental in marital relationships.

Disillusionment as a phenomenon is ever present in the narrative. The negotiation of the female protagonist with the harsh reality that exists all around her heightens and sustains a deep sense of un-fulfillment which is visible throughout the journey presented in the story. The narrative begins by giving the reader subtle hints regarding the real journey represented through the use of a metaphor induced narrative.

The start of the journey was, naturally, very enjoyable. They were filled with expectations about the extremely beautiful part of the world they were going to. But scooters cannot be relied upon for long journeys to distant places. Before they had gone very far, a screw came loose and the scooter stopped on the highway!

The journey being referred to in the opening line of the story quite explicitly suggests the nature of relationships in a social setting and its limitations. The scooter then stands for the phenomenon of marriage as a social practice, as an institutions and as an agent of legitimization. The fact that such themes are induced into the story highlights how Sarah Joseph’s work can be understood as a text that fall under both categories i.e a work written by a woman and female literature. Elaine Showalter in her book Literature of their Own while discussing “The Female Tradition” quotes the distinction G. H. Lewes makes with regard to books that are written by women and female literature. Lewes defines the latter as something “which purposefully and collectively concerns itself with the articulation of women’s experience, and which guides itself ‘by its own impulses’ to autonomous self-expression.”  

The short story brings to light the perspective of the woman substantially even though it employs a third person narration. This can be seen as a conscious attempt by the writer to induce into the literary tradition the tale of the woman and in the process write one’s body. The notion of writing the body made popular by Helene Cixous is mostly seen as a form of writing that explicitly deals with the female sexuality and the body in which both categories try to mark out space for itself. However what one needs to note is that such an approach is not really limited to the physical. The attempts of writers like Sarah Joseph through such narratives also write the female body in terms of the female perception and self which in turn constructs the physical self.

“But scooters cannot be relied upon for long journeys to distant places.” This is a recurrent imagery that occurs thrice in the story and marks the collapse of the moments of intimacy experienced by the man and the woman during their travel. The sentence used in repetition creates an air of inevitability. On inspection of the events that follow after the scooter breaks down one can quite clearly see that external forces help bring it back to life and ensure that the man, woman and child continue in their destined journey. The role of marriage, the importance inscribed to it, and the role of social structures in enforcing it is brought to light, questioned, critiqued and turned to satire here.

The role of the child as a uniting factor in a marriage is also questioned. The text not just questions it but also problematizes the whole concept. The struggle between the calm and loving mother figure assigned to the female protagonist by social structures and the female competitor in the relationship is brought to light. The roles assigned, be it arbitrary have normalized itself and hence creates conflict and ultimately brings alive a negotiation.

The scooter slipped from his grip and overturned and the child fell from her hands! The two of them looked angrily at each other.

Their eyes met and blazed in the hot noonday sun!

The child wailed loudly. Neither he nor she paid any attention.  

When the scooter falls for the second time, the man and the woman mock each other and laugh at each other. This momentary sense of dominance and a sense of liberation combined with a heightened sense of individuality leads to the fall of the child and neither pays attention to it.

The story critiques gender roles with regard to marriage as a form of relationship. Simone de Beauvoir, borrowing from the prevalent ideas posited by the existential school of thought asserts that the idea of existence precedes essence is quite important in the feminist discourse and that there exists no such thing as ‘femininity’ if we were to understand it as an essential attribute. Rather such a notion of femininity exists only as a constructed structure enforced by patriarchal norms. The end of the story serves also as a thesis to the general idea. In end the scooter breaks down for the third time due to a petrol leak and because the leak causes a nauseating odour the villagers make the man, woman and child carry the ‘decaying corpse’ on their heads. The collapse of a social institution or a signification of its inadequacies can be implied.

 

Works Cited

 

Cixous, Helene. “The Laugh of Medusa” Print

Joseph, Sarah. "The Scooter." The Daily Star 5 (2004): Web.

Niranjana, Tejaswini. "Feminism and Culture Studies in Asia." Print.

Showalter, Elaine. "The Female Tradition." A Literature of Their Own. 1977. Print.

 

                                                                                                                                                

CIA 3 Feminist approach of the movie ABCD (American Born Confused Desi)

Reginald Valsalan
1324108 / 2nd Sem. M.A English
Mass Communication / MEL 235
Prof. Anil Joseph Pinto and Prof. Vijayaganesh
 
                                                                         Feminist approach of the movie ABCD (American Born Confused Desi)
 
 Abstract: Cinema is meant and believed to entertain, to take the viewer to a world that is starkly different from the real one, a world which provides escape from the daily grind of life. Cinema is a popular media of mass consumption which plays a key role in molding opinions, constructing images and reinforcing dominant cultural values. The paper deals with representations of women characters in mainstream Molly Wood movies like 'ABCD' (American Born Confused Desi). It is deemed appropriate to examine this issue because women are a major chunk of the country's population and hence their portrayal on screen is crucial in determining the furtherance of already existing stereotypes in the society. This paper begins the description of how women are portrayed in the movie as a strong character without any support of a man. It also undertakes some glimpses from the film to analyze the portrayal.
 
Key Words: Cinema, Molly wood, movies, feminist, empowerment.
 
Introduction
                          Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, and social rights for women. Since 1970s, feminist film theory has revolutionized the way that films and their spectators can be understood. Feminist film theory has played a major role in improving the depiction of women role in the movies, the theory became the orthodox form of film theory, and such was the influence of it over the film industry.

                        The Aftermath of the World War 2 started giving importance to women because; it was an important time period in the continued development of gender roles in the United States. Because of the need for extra labor, women were for the first time, allowed to work outside the home in large numbers. This changed the perspective of women toward work, toward themselves, toward society and toward their place in society.  As a literary and then a filmic response to these massive changes a new narrative style emerged in the movie industry called the film noir. Film noir elevated the importance of women, often giving female characters a much more central role, showing women with greater strength and with more self-sufficiency. But these newly empowered women were also most often portrayed as inherently bad, or, at the very least, not as good as the Hollywood Virgin of earlier cinema.
 
                        The tentative thesis statement for the paper is: 'the tentative thesis for this paper is: 'portrayal of woman as an empowered character in the movie'. The study focuses on a Malyali woman who is a student in St.Aloysius College. Her ambition is to help the needy, but her good deeds have put some peoples honor and money at stake. Though she faces rough road on her way in doing good deeds, she stands firm like a rock. 

                        In the movie ABCD, the concept of empowered woman is brought in to light, though men try to treat women as an inferior or the 'other'. A similar ideology is implemented by the Indian society. However the will and courage of the Indian women break all these hurdles. The movie ABCD is purely a fiction, but the woman character introduced is the reflection of women in Kerala. The movie is about two Malayali NRI's from U.S.A who comes to study in Kerala. They meet Madhumitha (on whom the researcher's analysis is on) in her part time job of taking censes for the corporation, on people below poverty line. Then they meet her again in college, while she brings up a strike in college for increasing their fee, because it had lead one of her friends to the verge of suicide. She also helps these boys when they got into trouble with the politicians who she was going up against by helping the needy.

                       The researcher has analyzed various parts of the movie, which gives a clear picture of women empowerment and finally analysis the strength of the woman. When the protagonist Jacob and his friend is given a lift to college by the heroin Madhumitha, he tries to flirt with her by giving a crazy attitude, but instead of shying away or blushing, she stops her car and asked both of them to get out and drove off. This shows that, the film makers have exhibited an up graded version of Indian women who are not scared of men any more. In the olden days, film makers made movies where women don't know the right way of reacting to a man when he approaches her with a motive. She would either shy away or stand cowardly, not knowing what to say. Though the heroin is a bit harsh and rude to Jacob, it conveyed the message that women are not the age old concept of can be made to dance to a man's tune anymore, they have changed.

                       In another scene, the researcher focuses on the heroin and her woman friends, who stops classes in the whole college and starts off a strike, because one of their class mates tried to kill herself on the grounds that she could not afford to pay the hiked fees. When politicians and other business men heard about the ongoing strike, they comes to college to stop the ongoing strike from going any further, she along with her friends stand in front of the whole crowd present, instead of waging war hiding behind the shades, like how they were considered by the society to be. Today's world is a brand new world, with the transformation and molding, it has gone through a lot of changes even in the case of women. It has always been men, who have been doing the strikes or bandh, taking in to account the good or bad intention behind it. Even in movies until very recently, it is very rare to see women in such characters. This movie is a very strong example of changes in women portrayal in recent movies. Even when politicians and business men with very high level of influence threatened her and her friends to stop the strike or suffer the consequences, these girls replied to them saying, "You better pray that it is not you who is going cry for the things you have done". The girls were not bothered it was men or women they were going up against, according to they were fighting an evil.

                  The researcher looks at a scene where the protagonist Johns and his friend Kora, gets into  a trouble with the state government for getting involved with the Naxals, which was not true. Because they did not know what to do to save themselves, they went seeking Madhumitha's help. Understanding their situation, she accepts to help them by giving them shelter from police. Woman do have a big heart and are known to help, it has been proved to the world by great people like Mother Theresa, Diana etc But helping a person who has been convicted by the government falsely takes more than good heart. Here courage to stand up for a good cause and face whatever the consequences it may be plays a bigger role. Today it is thought by certain men that, women with such qualities do not exist. But through this movie, the filmmaker has shown it to the world that, it is a very wrong conception and, they are there and they are right amongst us.
The researcher concludes that, the film has indeed shown the empowerment of women. This is not the old age where women are considered as the second sex, they have come up in equal to the men this is a new age for women. Hitler's thoughts of woman has to be confined to the kitchen has rusted and withered away, they do not exist anymore.

Bibliography

Prakkat, Martin , ABCD (American Born Confused Desi), Prod Thameens 2013 Film, 14 June 2013.

Mulvey, Laura, Kaja Silverman, Barbara creed, and Teresa Lauretis. Feminist Film Theorist. 1. 1. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis group, 2006. 143. eBook. <http://talmidim.cz/filosofie/Feminist Film Theorists (Routledge Critical Thinkers) - Shohini Chaudhuri.pdf>.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

1324149 CIA 3

Shwetha Vipin

1324149

MEL 232

Contemporary Critical Theory

Dr. Anil Pinto

 

Housewives are no bonded slaves: A Reality check based on the Malayalam Movie ‘Veruthe Oru Bharya’

                          

Since the time of Simone de Beauvoir, Virginia Woolf, Alice walker and the like, we women have been told the heroic saga of women’s right struggle and women empowerment. Stories of battles against all odds to survive in this patriarchal world have been told for ages. The 2008 Malayalam movie ‘Veruthe oru Bharya’ directed by Akku Akbar, starring Jayaram and Gopika as the lead actors visualises the concept of Women  equality and recognition. The Malayalam film, which won many accolades for portraying one of the sensitive problems that woman faces, subtly traces the nuances of feminist theory. While providing a critique of social and political relations, much of feminist theory focuses on the promotion of women's rights and interests. Themes explored in feminist theory include discrimination, stereotyping, patriarchy and objectification (Sexual objectification also). The theme of this movie is akin to the themes in feminist theory where the protagonist is a prey of patriarchy, object of sexual pleasure and  stereotyped Indian housewife.    

This visual text which was released in 2008 explores the life of a middle class housewife who is enmeshed in a web of domestic complexities. The film is one of the best movies narrated with great intensity and integrity throughout and thereby sending a strong message that a wife is not a bonded slave to husband. The film echoes the woes of many housewives in need of equality and recognition in the family.

The movie revolves around the life of Sugunan, Bindu and their fourteen year old daughter Anjana. Sugunan is an employee with Kerala State Electricity Board and Bindu is the typical Indian housewife who is denied the freedom of economic independence by her chauvinistic husband. Her daughter too takes advantage of her. The daughter takes her mother for granted knowing that Bindu is emotionally vulnerable. Sugunan is a typical Malyali husband who habitually underestimates his wife’s capabilities. He takes pleasure in finding fault with her and takes pride in dominating her. In fact he flaunts his dominance to an unbearable extent.  He is an egoistic person who finds pleasure in taunting his wife and treating her as a mere living thing that obliges to his commands and pleasures. He contradicts his name which means the one with good qualities. She finds solace from her parents but unfortunately Sugunan forbids her from going to her parent’s house. He is seen as tyrant by her family. If Sugunan is the typical male chauvinistic pig, Bindu is the docile Indian wife and mother who is the epitome of tolerance and endurance.

The film ‘Veruthe Oru Bharya’, which in English translates as ‘a wife for nothing’. The title of the film is well justified with the protagonist (the wife) who is a victim of domestic disharmony. She is a mere puppet in the family whose life is confined within the four walls of the house. Her existence considered trivial and her labour unacknowledged by her husband and daughter, she is the sitting duck of her family’s hypocrisy. Her loyalty towards her husband and love towards her daughter forbids her to taste the fruit of independence .Bound to mundane domestic chores of her life; Bindu (the wife) wants to break free from the stereotyped world of condescension. As household chores keep her occupied all the time, Bindu does not have the leisure to go out and enjoy with her friends or attend public functions. On a trip with friends and families Sugunan forbids her from enjoying with others and embarrasses her in front of them. Also meeting the growing demands of her teenage daughter escalates her trauma. Her domestic drudgery begins at 5:00 am to 11:00 pm and when she goes to bed after the day’s ordeal she is forced to quench the carnal thirst of her sex-hungry husband. When things reach a saturation level (that is when Sugunan in a fit of rage phyisicaly abuses her) Bindu determines to leave the house and free herself from household duties. Like every women she too longed for freedom. Hers is a story of many untold tales where the underbelly of marriage is exposed.

      The second half of the movie is a self realisation for the father-daughter duo. The

sudden decision of Bindu to leave the house and stay with her parents brings an element of surprise to them. Never in their dreams had they thought that Bindu would leave them and become a rebel. Years of taking her for granted gave them the power to underestimate the real woman in her. Though the father and daughter struggle hard to manage the household , the pride in them prevents them from admitting and realising the worth of Bindu. Sugunan single-handedly tries to bring up Anjana but all in vain. The daughter again becomes the next vulnerable women. Brimming with adolescent beauty and fantasies she becomes an object of every male gaze. She is seen as an object of sexual pleasure by the male servant who comes to take care of the household in the absence of Bindu. With no mother to protect and care her security is questioned. A series of tragedy befalls this young woman after Bindu’s exit. The daughter falls for the lust of the neighbourhood boy. Her innocence is exploited with the carnal appetite of the male servant and the rogues who tries to sexually exploit her. The timely intervention of her father and policemen saves her from being exploited. All this substantiates the point that a woman is never safe anywhere, neither in her own house nor inside her mother’s womb.

   Women unlike men are mentally strong; Bindu shows immense mental strength when the tragedies befall the family unlike Sugunan who becomes paranoid. The pride and ego of  Sugunan diminishes with the unfortunate incident. At the end of the movie Bindu has become the liberated woman who is no longer submissive. Her silent struggle for equality and recognition did prove fruitful. Both the father and the daughter realised her worth and gave her the respect that she deserved. The tragedy in the family becomes an eye opener for Sugunan and his daughter.

Overall the film ‘Veruthe Oru Bharya’ with an undertone of feminism is one of the best thought-provoking movies released in the twenty first century. Also the movie sends a strong message to all male chauvinists in not to underestimate the capabilities of housewives. They are instrumental in keeping the family rooted and bounded. The fall of

women results in the fall of the family.

 

 

Exploring Queer Identity in the Malayalam movie 'Mumbai Police' (2013)

Malayalam literature reflects the spirit of accommodation and has over the centuries developed a tradition which, even while rooted in the locality, is truly universal in taste. It is remarkably free from the provincialisms and parochial prejudices that have bedeviled the literature of certain other areas. Legends and folklore have often taken the place of historical facts and chronology has been consciously or unconsciously tampered with. Malayalam movie industry

There is much archival evidence on the role Indian cinema played in the last 100 years to break taboos and create tolerance towards the transsexuals, transgenders and homosexuals. In spite of its interest in same gender relationships and transgender behaviors, Indian Cinema industry  is still a powerful ideological apparatus that criticizes ‘non straight’ subjectivities and pleasures. The cinematic representations of queer relations in Deepa Mehta’s Fire (1997), Karan Razdan’s Girl Friend (2004) and Tarun Manukshishi’s Dostana (2008) are not essentially queer in the sense that it victimizes or mocks its characters in the ‘regime of the normal’. (Michael Warner: 27)  While filmmakers were trying to step outside the beaten track of traditional Indian themes, there was no allowance for portrayal of same sex, a subject that was still taboo in a country where the discourse on sex itself is bound by moral restriction.

Indian film industry has flourished over the last 100 years. Rooted to reality subjects, a comparatively lesser interest in larger than life heroes and histrionics, subjects with social relevance filmed without frills and flavours and a film-literate public who applaud good work are something which only Malayalam films can boost of. The tradition of compulsory heterosexuality determines and distort the narrative dynamics of ‘non straight’ movies in India. Cinema in Kerala, though one of the most acclaimed film industries in the country, is not an exception to this homophobia. In Malayalam it is difficult to have straight queer movie that celebrates a difference. The Malayalam film makers in general dared not to break images of heteronormativity that come as a continuation of an age old oral and visual tradition and with which the audience are easily identified. In the last twenty years the queer identity has come to be taken more seriously in arts. Books had men declaring their sexual identity in no uncertain terms while cinema struggled to strike a balance between the morally acceptable lines the makers still complied to with the changing times.

The depiction of homosexuality in Malayalam cinema has always been timorous. One of the earliest film dates back to the 1978 film Randu Penkuttikal (Two Girls), directed by Mohan. The film was inspired by a lesbian novel Randu Penkuttikalude Katha (The Tale of Two Girls), and shows a close relationship between two girls. But, it ends with both marrying men, and one of the characters dismissing their relationship as "just a phase". In 1986, Padmarajan made a film that hinted at a lesbian relationship between the lead characters, Desadanakili Karayarilla (Migratory Birds Don't Cry). The leads were two runaway school girls, one of whom dressed like a boy. The sight of her friend's proximity to a man causes the girl emotional distress. However homosexuality is just an under-current in the film. The first Malayalam film that probably addressed lesbianism openly was Ligy J Pullappally's 2004 movie Sancharram (Travel) but it was confined to art circles and never really came into the mainstream.

Mumbai Police is a 2013 Indian Malayalam Crime thriller film written by Bobby-Sanjay and directed by Roshan Andrrews. It features Prithviraj, Jayasurya and Rahman in the lead roles, and is distributed by Central Picures. Roshan Andrews’s Mumbai Police is a movie that has scores of non-straight potential homosexual deposits. Though it is impossible to have a ‘public queer’ movie in a homophobic society like ours we can trace queer dynamics in these movies. A queer interpretation foregrounds the potency of cinema in remolding subjectivities, desires and pleasures in multicultural contexts. It helps us to perceive the ways in which patriarchy and its allies negotiate with the potentially disruptive instincts, striving to maintain a normative order that compliments their agenda. Hence queer analysis is not one that attempts to look at things from a different angle, but one that seeks to demolish those very angles that perpetuate hetero-patriarchal visions. So by targeting the deep text of the movies, the paper attempts to tease out the queer implications that run silently through this gustatory narrative and to foreground the fact that queer tastes of ‘Malayalees’ have  been suppressed in the unconscious layers of the text that apparently proclaims the ‘divinity’ of the straight heterosexual coupling.

The plot of the narrative is as follows: The movie opens with ACP Antony Moses (Prithviraj) getting into an accident which causes him, a partial memory loss. Before the accident, he had solved the murder case of his friend, Assistant Commissioner Aaryan John Jacob (Jayasurya), who was killed during a gallantry awards ceremony. Antony gets into the accident while talking to his senior officer and brother-in-law Farhan Ashraf (Rahman) Commissioner of police. He tells him that the case is solved but before giving the name of the murderer, accident occurs. After the treatment Farhan tells Antony, about his past and the tragedy occurred to their friend, Aaryan. He reassigns Antony Moses, back to the case. After the accident Antony Moses faces many issues because of his memory loss. He tries to complete the investigation with his clever ideas and implementing it with finesse. . Antony re investigates the case during which he finds out the murderer.

The story takes a twist as Antony Moses discovers darker sides of his own personality and the strength and integrity of the friendship he shared with the ‘Mumbai Police’ group, which is concreted by a personal video taken by the fiancée of Aaryan, just before the award ceremony,in which Aaryan rehearses his speech for the ceremony. This video causes a visible change in him and he delves deeper into the investigation with more personal desire for the truth.

It is then revealed in a shocking scene that Antony is in fact secretly gay, and had a seemingly sexual relationship with another gay man who happens to be a pilot for an international airline. The memory impaired Antony rebuffs his sexual advances and breaks down knowing the truth about his sexuality and violent personality with criminal tendencies which was a mask to his sexual orientation (which would be regarded as being especially shameful in the police force). It is then shown in a flashback that Aaryan was a witness to one of his sexual affairs and threatened Antony and his lover that he will do what is necessary according to protocol and breaks their friendship. A distraught Antony then plans an elaborate scheme to murder Aaryan at the awards ceremony before he supposedly discloses the shameful truth about Antony. After the murder he takes up the investigation charge and finally comes to the conclusion that he himself was the murder. Actually Farhan was making use of Antony to get all the evidences by himself so that he can arrest him. In the end it is revealed that only because of the reason that the truth about his sexuality (gay identity) of Antony was revealed, he killed his friend.

In a fleeting scene, swathed in darkness; this movie has thrown a shaft of light on an issue that is often ignored in our society. Thus the director has tried to explore a different dimension in this film. The climax of Mumbai Police is a hazy shot of lovemaking between two male actors. The act leads to the murder of a police officer, a twist on which the entire tale hangs. The film, the scene, and the character of Anthony Moses have sparked quite a bit of discussion since Malayalam cinema has never before portrayed a hero as gay. Heroes in mainstream Malayalam cinema have always personified macho perfection. They thrash bad guys, and romance beauties. So a gay character is quite a significant character.

Since normative vision of heterosexuality gets a comfortable popularity and an easy acceptance in the usual discourses of Malayalam cinema, no one dare to picturize a queer theme. But those texts which are apparently heterosexual in nature and pander to the audience’s need for heterosexual romance curtain an unconscious that is directly opposed to such an interpretation.  Mumbai Police by Roshan Andrews is such a text that reveals this kind of opposition between its surface and its unconscious queer desire. Prithviraj breaks the typical 'hero' mold and challenges sexual stereotyping. Queer theory also aims to examine hitherto unheard of voices, suppressed narratives, as well as the development of counter-hegemonic queer discourses that talk about same sex and other perverse desires and subjectivities. Sanjay, who scripted the film with his brother Bobby, says they were not trying to break a new ground and the film is based on the Freudian theory that any person who exhibits extreme manliness is hiding something, and the moment there is danger of his secret being revealed, he will go to any extent, including murder. With the upcoming of this movie it is clear that Malayalam film industry is no longer closing its eyes to an issue that always existed in our society.

The title of the movie has no significance to the actual sequences of events. Here through the language of film the director has tried to establish the queer identity of the character. In the last segments he really shows the problems that the protagonist have to face in his later life, once his identity is revealed in front of the society. He clearly mentions how society will respond to his hidden identity. Queer theory rejects the idea that sexuality is something determined by biology. In this movie the sexual power is embedded in a different level of social life but the director himself finally concludes that this identity is not something that is accepted by the society. Society isolates him and he is a stranger in the normative society. The suppressed narrative of Antony Moses is the hidden secret that is revealed in the climax. The main character is a ‘heterosexual queer’ in the sense that he go against the hetero- normative scripts by challenging conventions. Thus this movie tried to deconstruct the understanding of ‘queer identity’ and the mainstream Malayalam movie.

Prepared by Dhanya Zacharias, 1324128 (I MA English)

References:

http://www.colorado.edu/English/ENGL2012Klages/queertheory.html

www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QxAxe_oH-U

Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. 3rd. New Delhi : Viva Books, 2012. Print.

 

CIA 3 : Mathukutty T. K.

Mathukutty. K.

13 24154

MEL 232

Contemporary Critical Theory

Sir Anil Pinto

 

 

The Malayalam film ‘Veruthe Oru Bharya’ was directed by ‘AkkuAkbar.’ The movie is all about the important role played by the female character, as a housewife…..  I would like to move with a comparative study, and figure out how the feminism related to the female character in this movie. In the story the heroine seems to have more works in the house. On the other hand, husband is stating that, wife has nothing to do with the family apart from doing some cleaning and washing. And also, the husband is giving priority to his own work, and as the movie progresses the argument increases and the peace of the family fades. .... My attempt is to identify, what is feminism? And how this theory is applied to this story.

Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining and establishing, the social welfare of women. It includes seeking and establishing equal opportunities for women in education and employment. But in the movie, the male character is not even bothered of such consideration toward the female character, in other words his ego doesn’t allow him to do so.  Feminist theory, which emerged from feminist movements, aims to understand the nature of gender inequality by examining women's social roles and lived experience; it has developed theories in a variety of disciplines in order to respond to issues such as the social construction of sex and gender. There are uncountable gender issues that are happening in the society, in terms of cast, color, creed, and religion, and feminism played a crucial role to debate on female survival.   Some of the earlier forms of feminism have been criticized for taking into account only white, middle-class, educated perspectives. This led to the creation of ethnically specific or multiculturalists forms of feminism.

To a man what he does is so personal to him; but, to a woman her feelings are very personal to her. So to compliment a man, speak positively about his performance, and to compliment a women, could even ignore the performance, but affirm her feelings. To a man ‘you did well’ is important. To a woman ‘I am feeling good about what you did’ is more important than ‘you did well.’ Here the heroine feels lonely, when her family members go to different places. Children to the school, and the husband to the office. Her numberless duties were increasing day by day, as the domestic instruments such as mixi, grinder, iron-box washing-machine got damaged and the husband never bothered to repair it. Since the husband was unaffected by these domestic tasks, he even managed to buy few domestic animals. The women gathered in group, stating a few complaints against the existing patriarchal system and demanding the possibilities.

 

Even today, feminists continued to campaign for the reform of family laws which gave husbands control over their wives. Women still had very few rights. For instance, in France married women received the right to work without their husband's permission. Charles Furies, a utopian socialist and French philosopher, is credited with having coined the word "feminism" in 1837. The words "feminism" and "feminist" first appeared in France and the Netherlands in 1872, Great Britain in the 1890s, and the United States in 1910. Depending on historical moment, culture and   country, feminists around the world have had different causes and goals. Most western feminist historians assert that all movements that work to obtain women’s rights should be considered feminist movements, even when they did not apply the term to themselves. Feminist theory aims to understand gender inequality and focuses on gender politics, power relations, and sexuality. While providing a critique of these social and political relations, much of feminist theory also focuses on the promotion of women's rights and interests. Themes explored in feminist theory include discrimination, in the field of literary criticism.

Feminism and sexuality

Over the course of the 1970s, a large variety of influential women accepted lesbianism and bisexuality as part of feminism.  As a result, a significant proportion of feminists favored this view; however, others considered sexuality irrelevant to the attainment of other goals.

Feminist attitudes to female sexuality have taken a few different directions. Matters such as the sex industry, sexual representation in the media, and issues regarding consent to sex under conditions of male dominance have been particularly controversial among feminists. Pornography considered as violence against women. Anti- pornography feminists argue that, it is dangerous for women and those sexually explicit images need to be controlled. Feminists' views on prostitution vary, but many of these perspectives can be loosely arranged into an overarching standpoint that is generally either critical or supportive of prostitution. Anti-prostitution feminists are strongly opposed to prostitution, as they see it as a form of violence against and exploitation of women, and a sign of male dominance over women.  Feminists argue that sexual violence committed by men is often rooted in ideologies of male sexual entitlement, and that these systems grant women very few legitimate options to refuse sexual advances. In many cultures, men do not believe that a woman has the right to reject a man's sexual advances or to make an autonomous decision about participating in sex. Feminists argue that all cultures are, in one way or another, dominated by ideologies that largely deny women the right to decide how to express their sexuality, because men under patriarchy feel entitled to define sex on their own terms. This entitlement can take different forms, depending on the culture. In many parts of the world, especially in conservative and religious cultures, marriage is regarded as an institution which requires a wife to be sexually available at all times, virtually without limit; thus, forcing or coercing sex on a wife is not considered a crime or even an abusive behavior.

Above all else, one thing a man never handle is the unhappiness of his woman. He tends to escape from any situation where he finds his woman unhappy. Even when he is not personally responsible for what had happened, he cannot face the unhappiness of his woman. If a woman wants a loving marriage then she has to be a happy wife. On the other hand a woman, however successful and independent, likes her man to take care of her as if she were his child. She needs that parental touch from her man. Her best comes out when she knows that her man is protective of her. If a man wants a loving marriage then he has to be a proactive lover. 

Surgeons do jugaad in the operation theatre http://toi.in/bFQapY @timesofindia

Exploring Queer Identity in the Malayalam movie 'Mumbai Police' (2013)

Malayalam literature reflects the spirit of accommodation and has over
the centuries developed a tradition which, even while rooted in the
locality, is truly universal in taste. It is remarkably free from the
provincialisms and parochial prejudices that have bedeviled the
literature of certain other areas. Legends and folklore have often
taken the place of historical facts and chronology has been
consciously or unconsciously tampered with. Malayalam movie industry
There is much archival evidence on the role Indian cinema played in
the last 100 years to break taboos and create tolerance towards the
transsexuals, transgenders and homosexuals. In spite of its interest
in same gender relationships and transgender behaviors, Indian Cinema
industry is still a powerful ideological apparatus that criticizes
'non straight' subjectivities and pleasures. The cinematic
representations of queer relations in Deepa Mehta's Fire (1997), Karan
Razdan's Girl Friend (2004) and Tarun Manukshishi's Dostana (2008) are
not essentially queer in the sense that it victimizes or mocks its
characters in the 'regime of the normal'. (Michael Warner: 27) While
filmmakers were trying to step outside the beaten track of traditional
Indian themes, there was no allowance for portrayal of same sex, a
subject that was still taboo in a country where the discourse on sex
itself is bound by moral restriction.
Indian film industry has flourished over the last 100 years. Rooted to
reality subjects, a comparatively lesser interest in larger than life
heroes and histrionics, subjects with social relevance filmed without
frills and flavours and a film-literate public who applaud good work
are something which only Malayalam films can boost of. The tradition
of compulsory heterosexuality determines and distort the narrative
dynamics of 'non straight' movies in India. Cinema in Kerala, though
one of the most acclaimed film industries in the country, is not an
exception to this homophobia. In Malayalam it is difficult to have
straight queer movie that celebrates a difference. The Malayalam film
makers in general dared not to break images of heteronormativity that
come as a continuation of an age old oral and visual tradition and
with which the audience are easily identified. In the last twenty
years the queer identity has come to be taken more seriously in arts.
Books had men declaring their sexual identity in no uncertain terms
while cinema struggled to strike a balance between the morally
acceptable lines the makers still complied to with the changing times.
The depiction of homosexuality in Malayalam cinema has always been
timorous. One of the earliest film dates back to the 1978 film Randu
Penkuttikal (Two Girls), directed by Mohan. The film was inspired by a
lesbian novel Randu Penkuttikalude Katha (The Tale of Two Girls), and
shows a close relationship between two girls. But, it ends with both
marrying men, and one of the characters dismissing their relationship
as "just a phase". In 1986, Padmarajan made a film that hinted at a
lesbian relationship between the lead characters, Desadanakili
Karayarilla (Migratory Birds Don't Cry). The leads were two runaway
school girls, one of whom dressed like a boy. The sight of her
friend's proximity to a man causes the girl emotional distress.
However homosexuality is just an under-current in the film. The first
Malayalam film that probably addressed lesbianism openly was Ligy J
Pullappally's 2004 movie Sancharram (Travel) but it was confined to
art circles and never really came into the mainstream.
Mumbai Police is a 2013 Indian Malayalam Crime thriller film written
by Bobby-Sanjay and directed by Roshan Andrrews. It features
Prithviraj, Jayasurya and Rahman in the lead roles, and is distributed
by Central Picures. Roshan Andrews's Mumbai Police is a movie that has
scores of non-straight potential homosexual deposits. Though it is
impossible to have a 'public queer' movie in a homophobic society like
ours we can trace queer dynamics in these movies. A queer
interpretation foregrounds the potency of cinema in remolding
subjectivities, desires and pleasures in multicultural contexts. It
helps us to perceive the ways in which patriarchy and its allies
negotiate with the potentially disruptive instincts, striving to
maintain a normative order that compliments their agenda. Hence queer
analysis is not one that attempts to look at things from a different
angle, but one that seeks to demolish those very angles that
perpetuate hetero-patriarchal visions. So by targeting the deep text
of the movies, the paper attempts to tease out the queer implications
that run silently through this gustatory narrative and to foreground
the fact that queer tastes of 'Malayalees' have been suppressed in
the unconscious layers of the text that apparently proclaims the
'divinity' of the straight heterosexual coupling.
The plot of the narrative is as follows: The movie opens with ACP
Antony Moses (Prithviraj) getting into an accident which causes him, a
partial memory loss. Before the accident, he had solved the murder
case of his friend, Assistant Commissioner Aaryan John Jacob
(Jayasurya), who was killed during a gallantry awards ceremony. Antony
gets into the accident while talking to his senior officer and
brother-in-law Farhan Ashraf (Rahman) Commissioner of police. He tells
him that the case is solved but before giving the name of the
murderer, accident occurs. After the treatment Farhan tells Antony,
about his past and the tragedy occurred to their friend, Aaryan. He
reassigns Antony Moses, back to the case. After the accident Antony
Moses faces many issues because of his memory loss. He tries to
complete the investigation with his clever ideas and implementing it
with finesse. . Antony re investigates the case during which he finds
out the murderer.
The story takes a twist as Antony Moses discovers darker sides of his
own personality and the strength and integrity of the friendship he
shared with the 'Mumbai Police' group, which is concreted by a
personal video taken by the fiancée of Aaryan, just before the award
ceremony,in which Aaryan rehearses his speech for the ceremony. This
video causes a visible change in him and he delves deeper into the
investigation with more personal desire for the truth.
It is then revealed in a shocking scene that Antony is in fact
secretly gay, and had a seemingly sexual relationship with another gay
man who happens to be a pilot for an international airline. The memory
impaired Antony rebuffs his sexual advances and breaks down knowing
the truth about his sexuality and violent personality with criminal
tendencies which was a mask to his sexual orientation (which would be
regarded as being especially shameful in the police force). It is then
shown in a flashback that Aaryan was a witness to one of his sexual
affairs and threatened Antony and his lover that he will do what is
necessary according to protocol and breaks their friendship. A
distraught Antony then plans an elaborate scheme to murder Aaryan at
the awards ceremony before he supposedly discloses the shameful truth
about Antony. After the murder he takes up the investigation charge
and finally comes to the conclusion that he himself was the murder.
Actually Farhan was making use of Antony to get all the evidences by
himself so that he can arrest him. In the end it is revealed that only
because of the reason that the truth about his sexuality (gay
identity) of Antony was revealed, he killed his friend.
In a fleeting scene, swathed in darkness; this movie has thrown a
shaft of light on an issue that is often ignored in our society. Thus
the director has tried to explore a different dimension in this film.
The climax of Mumbai Police is a hazy shot of lovemaking between two
male actors. The act leads to the murder of a police officer, a twist
on which the entire tale hangs. The film, the scene, and the character
of Anthony Moses have sparked quite a bit of discussion since
Malayalam cinema has never before portrayed a hero as gay. Heroes in
mainstream Malayalam cinema have always personified macho perfection.
They thrash bad guys, and romance beauties. So a gay character is
quite a significant character.
Since normative vision of heterosexuality gets a comfortable
popularity and an easy acceptance in the usual discourses of Malayalam
cinema, no one dare to picturize a queer theme. But those texts which
are apparently heterosexual in nature and pander to the audience's
need for heterosexual romance curtain an unconscious that is directly
opposed to such an interpretation. Mumbai Police by Roshan Andrews is
such a text that reveals this kind of opposition between its surface
and its unconscious queer desire. Prithviraj breaks the typical 'hero'
mold and challenges sexual stereotyping. Queer theory also aims to
examine hitherto unheard of voices, suppressed narratives, as well as
the development of counter-hegemonic queer discourses that talk about
same sex and other perverse desires and subjectivities. Sanjay, who
scripted the film with his brother Bobby, says they were not trying to
break a new ground and the film is based on the Freudian theory that
any person who exhibits extreme manliness is hiding something, and the
moment there is danger of his secret being revealed, he will go to any
extent, including murder. With the upcoming of this movie it is clear
that Malayalam film industry is no longer closing its eyes to an issue
that always existed in our society.
The title of the movie has no significance to the actual sequences of
events. Here through the language of film the director has tried to
establish the queer identity of the character. In the last segments he
really shows the problems that the protagonist have to face in his
later life, once his identity is revealed in front of the society. He
clearly mentions how society will respond to his hidden identity.
Queer theory rejects the idea that sexuality is something determined
by biology. In this movie the sexual power is embedded in a different
level of social life but the director himself finally concludes that
this identity is not something that is accepted by the society.
Society isolates him and he is a stranger in the normative society.
The suppressed narrative of Antony Moses is the hidden secret that is
revealed in the climax. The main character is a 'heterosexual queer'
in the sense that he go against the hetero- normative scripts by
challenging conventions. Thus this movie tried to deconstruct the
understanding of 'queer identity' and the mainstream Malayalam movie.

Prepared by Dhanya Zacharias, 1324128 (I MA English)

References:
http://www.colorado.edu/English/ENGL2012Klages/queertheory.html
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QxAxe_oH-U
Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory An Introduction to Literary and
Cultural Theory. 3rd. New Delhi : Viva Books, 2012. Print.

CIA 3 - A Feminist approach on the Sandalwood Cinema - Kiran Bedi

Angelo Savio Pereira

1324103 / 2nd Sem. M.A English

Mass Communication / MEL 235

Prof. Anil Joseph Pinto and Prof. Vijayaganesh       

 

A Feminist approach on the Sandalwood Cinema - Kiran Bedi

 

Abstract: Cinema is meant and believed to entertain, to take the viewer to a world that is starkly different from the real one, a world which provides escape from the daily grind of life. Cinema is a popular media of mass consumption which plays a key role in moulding opinions, constructing images and reinforcing dominant cultural values. The paper deals with representations of the woman, in the mainstream Sandalwood movie - ‘Kiran Bedi'. It is deemed appropriate to examine this issue because women are a major chunk of the country's population and hence their portrayal on screen is crucial in determining the furtherance of already existing stereotypes in the society. The paper begins with a discussion on the field of feminist film criticism and how mainstream Kannda Cinema has restricted itself to define sketches of womanhood.

 

Feminism though mostly considered as a social theory is more of a post-colonial and psychoanalytical theory which has had an enormous impact on film theory and criticism. Feminist scholars began applying the new theories arising from these movements to analyzing films. Initial attempts in the United States in the early 1970’s were generally based on sociological theory and focused on the function of women characters in particular film narratives or genres and of stereotypes as a reflection of a society's view of women.

 

Cinema is taken by feminists to be a cultural practice representing myths about women and femininity, as well as about men and masculinity. Issues of representation and spectatorship are central to feminist film theory and criticism. Early feminist criticism was directed at stereotypes of women in mediums like advertisements (print and electronic), in films etc. The image of woman portrayed in various old Kannada movies were that of a 'sacrificer', culturally exploited woman. Such fixed and endlessly repeated images of women were considered to be objectionable as they presented them as mutes who could probably have a negative impact on the female spectator as and these lacked strength and righteousness; hence, the call for positive images of women in cinema. However Omprakash Rao’s ‘Kannada Kiran Bedi’ proved to be a milestone were the image of woman was elevated from a sufferer to an achiever bringing pride for the state.

 

The article would speak about the magnification of a woman’s ability in a state like Karnataka were women are considered weak. The fiction goes against Jacques Lacan theory in which the woman is considered as ‘lack’. The cinema gives its viewers a completely different idea of a woman. Her strength and capabilities are projected to a great extent. The feminist movie is about a lady IPS Officer, who is as bold and strong as a man and uses her abilities to rid the city of Bangalore from dirt like corruption and criminals. The lady officer indicates the new avatar of the women in the state. It motivates the other women to be bold and courageous so that they can change the image of a woman from the ‘weak’ and ‘oppressed’ that everyone has about an Indian Woman.

 

The story has no connection with the real life incidents that happened in the life of the much celebrated Delhi based Police officer Kiran Bedi. However Om Prakash Rao has retained his reputation as the remix specialist through this film. Kiran Bedi has the story which is a mix of several non Kannada films and it has been largely influenced by the Telugu film 'Vikramarkudu'. Nevertheless Kiran Bedi has elements which can appeal to the mass audience. The film's strength is the action sequences which have been choreographed with rich production values. And the film's fast pace is certain to enthuse the audience. Though the story lacks any original link, the narration is filled with commercial elements. Malashri still remains the same level of enthusiasm which elevated her to stardom many years ago. Even now she looks like a Lady Amithabh with her daring stunts. Ashish Vidyarthi scores much in the role of Bhoopathy, the main villain. Veterans Rangayana Raghu, Sreenivasa Murthy, Suchayeendra Prasad have done very well in their respective roles.

 

The paper consists of few scenes in which a clear feminist idea has been depicted and analysed. In the beginning the story, the officer Kiran Bedi is busy in clearing cases. She uses her power and abilities to take down petty thieves, single handed. The fights were basically for entertainment, however, the single handed fight portray a very significant message of a woman’s capabilities. A woman, if dedicated can do much more than a man even though she is considered weak and dependent. She uses her weakness as her strength to get what she aims for. The movie also aims at promoting the Karnataka Police and creates an image of respect for the Department.

 

The movie focuses on the lady top cop, who is totally against illegal activities and does wonderfully well in her career. The cop is sent to the city of Bangalore, where majority of the criminal activities take place. She is sent there mainly to bring down a notorious gang that are involved in various criminal activities like narcotics, murder, theft etc. The cop finds it difficult to bring their activities to an end because they hold a lot of power in their hands. However, she squeezes in and cuts some strings to take them down. Her talents and bravery help her immensely to achieve her target. There is a scene in which the main villain Bhoopathy delivers a sexist remark, what can a woman do to us? When the government itself is in our hands, why should they fear a useless woman cop? The statements said, symbolise the typical Indian attitude of the society about women of the country. The idea of making the woman as the weaker sex has led the country into following the same and hence all women are considered inferior. It is very difficult for a man to accept that a woman can do much more than he is able to do.  

 

In the movie, the antagonist’s Bhoopathy’s son is a rapist and a murderer. He walks into any place he likes and picks beautiful women and rapes them. The man is truly anti-feminine and a disgrace to the society. There is no respect shown to the women and they are treated like vegetables or cattle. However Kiran, makes it clear to all the viewers that women are no more those helpless beings. They are capable and hence she creates an emergency forum where women can post their problems directly to her. At the end she gives him a brutal death only to indicate the power of a woman and any person who tries to oppress a woman will be dealt with severely.       

 

At the end of the movie, a lady who looks similar to Kiran Bedi manages to wipe the city off all the rot. The original Kiran Bedi does her best to clear the city, but is killed by the gangsters. However, her twin, an unknown woman completes her work. Symbolically, the movie indicates that it is not just that single woman (Kiran Bedi) who had the skill to get rid of all the evil in the society, but all women who possess the will and the ambition can do what they aim for and build a new identity in the society, just as the lady cop Kiran Bedi.

 

The researcher would concluded by saying all similar movies that focus on empowerment of woman have greatly changed the stereotype that the society has on the Indian Women. It is now the duty of each woman to live up to the idea and build on it, so that the image of the woman does not go back to, the ancient stereotype of woman being the ‘weak’ ‘helpless’ and ‘oppressed’ sex.

 

Bibliography

 

Rao, Om Prakash, dir. Kiran Bedi. Prod. Ramu Enterprises, 2009. Film. 16 Jan 2014.

 

Fuery, Patrick, and Kelli Fuery. "The Image as Rhizome." Trans. Array Visual Cultures and Critical Theory. Great Britain: Oxford University Press Inc., 2003. Print.

     

Saturday, February 15, 2014

The Mirror Stage as formative of the Function of the I as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience

The Mirror Stage as formative of the Function of the I as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience 

Much like Freud, Lacan developed his own theories of the unconscious.  But most of his theories broke away from Freud, which never made Lacan very welcome in the Psychoanalytical Society. Even though Freud recognized a fractured ‘Self’ because of the dichotomy of conscious/unconscious mind, he always propounded a method to unify the two in order to create a complete or whole ‘Self’.

For Lacan however, there was no such this as ‘I’ or ‘self’. It can never exist. Only as an idea. Lacan’s main theory looked at how this illusion the western world called the ‘Self’ was created, and how the child developed this notion. Like Freud, Lacan also believed in the ‘polymorphously perverse’ stage of being, seen in infants. But unlike Freud’s Oral, Anal and Phalllic stages of development, Lacan created the Real, Imaginary and Symbolic stages for the child to recognize the ‘self’.

The Real stage is the stage of ‘needs’. The child has needs and these needs are met immediately by the mother and so the child has no need for language.  The polymorphously perverse child does not see itself as different from the mother and so has no sense of self.  But as the child grows, the mother spends more time away. This imaginary stage is also the stage of demands. Here language begins to develop for the child demands the presence of the mother. The child is still not completely aware that it is the ‘other’ and not part of the mother, as its demands are also met.

The symbolic stage is the most crucial in development of the self, and is also called the stage of desire. The Mirror stage as Lacan calls it is when the child sees itself in a mirror and is forced to see itself as a complete, whole being in itself. The mother or others around the child, point to the image in the mirror and tell the child “that is you!” the child now knows that it is a ‘Self’ without the presence of the mother.

This is how the idea of the self is created in children from a very young age. But this theory has its limitations. For it depends completely on visuals and vision and is debatable in the case of congenitally, visually impaired children.

(Post by Mala Krishnamurthy. Notes made for class on 3rd Feb 2014. )